2

Which expression would be better in formal academic writing?

  1. The percentage of incidence is approaching approximately 80%.
  2. The proportion of incidence is approaching approximately 80%.

I believe both ways would be fine, but would like to know any subtle difference in nuance.

3
  • 2
    Neither sound idiomatic to me. We don't have the full context, but my guess is you don't want either percentage or proportion, OR the word approximately. And quite possibly incidence isn't a good word for the context. How about X now happens in nearly 80% of [cases under consideration]? Commented Aug 20, 2017 at 14:13
  • 2
    "approaching approximately" sounds like you're deliberately trying to be vague or misleading! Like something from How To Lie With Statistics.
    – Stuart F
    Commented Jul 13, 2023 at 10:10
  • Percentage/ratio/proportion confusion
    – ryang
    Commented Mar 10 at 0:48

4 Answers 4

2

Both of these are awkward and redundant.

Say: "The incidence is approximately 80%."

or: "The incidence approaches 80%".

4
  • "The incidence (today) is approximately 80%." "The incidence is (in the course of) approaching 80%."
    – ryang
    Commented Mar 10 at 0:45
  • @ryang The first example here makes sense, the second does not. If you were trying to make a point by way of example and not asking if these are grammatical, please reword the second sentence so that it does not use "in the course of".
    – BadZen
    Commented Mar 24 at 20:25
  • Please explain your downvote so that the answer can be improved.
    – BadZen
    Commented Mar 24 at 20:25
  • I commented here rather than immediately under the OP to complement your suggestions, my second suggestion is in the context of approaching an asymptote, and no I didn't downvote your answer.
    – ryang
    Commented Mar 25 at 0:46
1

“The proportion/percentage of incidence” doesnt make sense. Everything is an incident. What might make sense: “The percentage of incidents involving bicycles”.

“Percentage” would be something like 33.3%. “Proportion” would be “one in three”.

0

If the discipline is epidemiology, medicine, or anything related, then both are wrong. This was potentially a specialist question and I'm not sure how well it fits this SE, but here are my reflections. In peer reviewed work, a native English speaking peer reviewer would probably be willing to suggest some corrections, but it's definitely not their job to proofread the entire paper. We would often suggest that the writer hire a proofreader separately, which I recognize can be a financial barrier.

Generally, people trained in statistics would interpret proportion on a scale of 0 to 1. That is, 0.5 is 50%. Proportion and percentage reflect the same concept, but are calculated differently. You would be understood if you reported a proportion of 50%, but it is wrong. We'd say something like:

79.8% of the astronauts in our sample had spaceflight accidents.

We would normally report the exact figure rounded to an appropriate number of decimal places. If you have the exact percentage or the exact numerator and denominator reported in your table, you may be able to say approximately 80% in the text, but it might be regarded as unusual.

Incidence is a measure of the number of new cases. It doesn't make sense at all to report a percent, and readers might not know what you mean. While the topic of incidence is more complex, we'd normally say something like

The incidence rate of spacecraft accidents was 1.2 cases per 100,000 spaceflights.

Or

The incidence rate of spacecraft accidents was 1.2 cases per 100,000 person-years.

One person-year is one person at risk for one year. Briefly, you might have one different astronaut flying for each month of a year. That's a total of one person-year at risk.

-1

There is a small difference, in that when describing percentage, you must give a value out of one hundred. As for proportion, you can say 8 out of 10 times.... or 4 out of 5.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .