3

In the words like "splatter", "splash", "split" and "explain" should I make an aspirated or an unaspirated "p" sound? I can't decide which way is correct. I need your help.

2 Answers 2

3

Voiceless plosives /p/, /t/, & /k/ are not aspirated:

  • after /s/ sound: "splatter," "splash," "split," and "explain"
  • at the end of words: fat, back

Aside from that, they are usually aspirated but not as strong as in Received Pronunciation (British).

2

In most varieties of English, voiceless plosives (/p/, /t/, /k/) are aspirated when they are the whole of the onset of a syllable, but not when they are in a cluster at the onset of a syllable.

So /p/ is not aspirated in any of your examples. It is aspirated in "patter" (but not "platter" or "spatter") and "passion", "pit", and "impound".

For me (British English), it is not normally aspirated in "expand" though, and I think that is because I effectively pronounce it as "ek-spand"

18
  • Thank you. But this doesn't apply when /p/, /t/ and /k/ are the first letters in a cluster like in "secret", right? I should make an aspirated "k" sound in this word as far as I know. But in the word "excuse", I should make an unaspirated sound at the second "k" according to what you said, right? I always pronounce both "k"s in "excuse" as aspirated sounds actually. I need to change my way then. Also as far as I know if there is "r" after "t" like in "street", "stream" etc, we make an aspirated "t" sound as far as I can remember. Am I wrong? Commented Dec 18, 2017 at 12:07
  • Also for example in "hatred" the "t" is pronounced as an aspirated sound despite being a part of a cluster. Btw "street" sounds better to me when I don't aspirate the "t". But as I said I think I heard before that if there is "r" after "t", the "t" should be aspirated. What I heard seems to be wrong. Commented Dec 18, 2017 at 12:21
  • I also should aspirate the voiceless stops in the words like "apply", "atrocious" "apron" etc. too, shouldn't I? I hope somebody answers these. :) Commented Dec 18, 2017 at 12:51
  • 2
    Hmm, that's a bit misleading. Aspiration is just a period of devoiced vowel after a plosive. It's caused by a lag in the vocal fold vibration starting up. There is no aspiration in platter, but there is of course devoicing of the /l/, which is basically the same thing - we just reserve the term aspiration for devoiced vowels. However, this does not happen when a plosive is preceded by an /s/ at the beginning of the syllable. In other words there'll be no aspiration in spatter and no devoicing of the /l/ in splatter. Commented Dec 18, 2017 at 14:36
  • @Araucaria Shouldn't the /p/ in "platter" be aspirated since it is the first letter of the syllable? Commented Jan 10, 2018 at 23:57

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .