9

Maximum time I face this problem by saying listening music. Is there any traditional cause behind this?

Can we use listen music or listening music?

Seems there is only a slight difference, but why is listen to music the right way to say it?

Improve this question
3
  • 1
    +1 for giving space to listening music and listening to music. Furthermore, listening to MJ and listening MJ as related questions.
    – Maulik V
    Commented Jan 9, 2014 at 5:56
  • what about .. I help you to listen music or I help you to listen to music
    – user19167
    Commented Apr 25, 2015 at 11:15
  • You don't say "to listen music" because it isn't registered in dictionaries.
    – rogermue
    Commented Jan 2, 2016 at 2:31

3 Answers 3

Reset to default
13

Listen is an intransitive verb: it does not take a direct object. It means “be attentive to sounds”. Consequently, these are complete sentences.

I listen.
Listen! ... (This is a command, with the subject you understood.)

If you want to indicate that you are attentive to a particular kind of sound you must express this with a prepositional phrase.

I listen to music. ... Music is playing and I attend to it.
Listen for the bell. ... The bell will ring; be attentive, so you notice when that happens.

Improve this answer
7
  • I was listening MJ where to is dropped.
    – Maulik V
    Commented Jan 9, 2014 at 5:58
  • @MaulikV: what does your sentence mean? It doesn't sound right to me.
    – Steve Melnikoff
    Commented Jan 9, 2014 at 10:50
  • @SteveMelnikoff This means I was listening Michael Jackson (his tacks). I think 'to' is not needed there (I was listening to Michael Jackson).
    – Maulik V
    Commented Jan 9, 2014 at 10:54
  • 3
    @MaulikV: the "to" is needed, for the reasons described in StoneyB's answer.
    – Steve Melnikoff
    Commented Jan 9, 2014 at 10:58
  • @SteveMelnikoff We shall have to recheck. When you listen to an artist, you may directly say, "I'm listening MJ." Native speaker's comment would be useful. Listening to music is fine but Listening to Michael Jackson is doubtful.
    – Maulik V
    Commented Jan 9, 2014 at 11:02
1

"Listen" or "listening" is an important difference in verb tense; "to" is a preposition, as would be "with" if your meaning were different. Both your verb tense and choice of preposition determine the meaning of the sentence. For example, at first glance:

  • "Listen to music" appears to be a command/suggestion.
  • "Listening to music" appears to be a statement about what you're doing right now.
  • "Listen with music" appears to be a suggestion to listen to something (other than music) with music added. For instance, you might be listening to a dialogue between two people, then adding dramatic background music to make it more interesting, and asking someone to listen to the second version with the added music (maybe after having listened to the first version without music).
Improve this answer
0

Listen is an intransitive verb which means that the verb cannot have a direct object. So in the sentence:

I listen to music.

music is an indirect object because the verb and the object are connected using to.

If you had:

I listen music.

It would be a direct object because there is no preposition liking the verb and the object. So this is incorrect.

Improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .