1

I wrote this sentence (actually, part of it ;)

Similar problems may arise if a voiceless plosive /p/ is understood as a voiced plosive /b/ then a ‘pour’ becomes a ‘bore’. It is especially the case for the Arabic language where there is no sound for /p/.

I used "where" because I used "the case" before it. I hope it doesn't refer to the "Arabic language"?! does my construction convey what I mean?

Actually, I am asking about the reference of "where" in the sentence. Because a language is not a location! then it must refer to the "case". For example probably I couldn't say:

In Arabic where there is no sound for /p/, a "pour" may be perceived a "bore"

  • I don't understand your question. The sentence looks okay. It implies that in the Arabic there is no sound for /p/. – CowperKettle Jul 9 '15 at 18:30
  • @CopperKettle The question was about the reference of "where". But as the sentence seems Okey, I have no problem with it. – Ahmad Jul 9 '15 at 18:37
  • 2
    I think "which has no /p/ sound" is better than "where there is no sound for /p/". – snailcar Jul 9 '15 at 18:42
  • 1
    @CopperKettle yes thank you, meanwhile I edited my question, however you almost answered it. – Ahmad Jul 9 '15 at 18:44
  • 1
    As kind of hinted at by @Copperkettle, where can replace in which or other prepositio phrases. Because we can use in which in your sentence, where is also good. – Araucaria - Not here any more. Jul 10 '15 at 12:56
1

That sentence sounds completely natural. You have used 'where' correctly.

Yes, it is referring to "the case". It's looking at a logical case or situation abstractly, as a location where you can be. Or, at thinking about that case as a location where your mind is.

Then, it's using the language you would use to describe the properties of a location:

I went to Germany last month, where they don't drink tap water.
I live in Colorado, where people ski a lot.
This is not the case in Iowa, where there are no mountains.

To speak less abstractly and more directly, you could say:

It is especially the case for the Arabic language, in which there is no sound for /p/.

This is less abstract because languages include sounds, so the sounds are in the language, but a language is not technically a place where things can be.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.