Is "She's got to have noticed." less correct-sounding than, for example, "She must have noticed."? In american-English and in general.
1 Answer
Not particularly. I suppose it is a bit more casual in its sound, i.e., less formal, but it doesn't sound at all incorrect.
-
-
I shouldn't be surprised. After all, Brits are the ones that refer to companies in the plural 8>) "Microsoft have a monopoly."– rcookCommented Sep 27, 2020 at 2:58
-
1Has got to doesn't sound American to me - has to maybe (although that's much more common now too) Commented Sep 27, 2020 at 13:06