1

I sometimes hear non-natives say "Whose ever" instead of "Who's ever". Then maybe they confuse it with "Whoever's"?

Where could this come from and is it any way correct?

  • You can take whose ever/who's ever/whoever's seat you want.
3
  • How can you tell which they are saying? They sound like homophones to me.
    – J.R.
    Commented Sep 29, 2017 at 9:16
  • @J.R. hear say isn't exactly what it means. I meant I stumble upon such confusion. Commented Sep 29, 2017 at 18:36
  • You should say "write" if you read it; "say" if you hear it.
    – J.R.
    Commented Sep 29, 2017 at 22:02

2 Answers 2

2

Two of the three options are correct:

  • You can take whose ever seat you want. (More formal)
  • You can take whoever's seat you want. (More colloquial)

"Who's ever" is incorrect (unless it stands for "who is ever" or "who has ever", which it can't in this sentence).

The possessive form of "who" is always "whose", although "who's" is a commonly seen misspelling.

(Fowler's Modern English Usage, 1965, has: whoever. Forms. Subjective: whoever, whosoever (emphatic), who-e'er (poetic), whoso (archaic), whosoe'er (poetic). Objective: whomever (rare), whoever (colloq.), whomsoever (literary), whomsoe'er (poetic), whomso (archaic). Possessive: whose ever, whoever's (colloq.), whosesoever (archaic).)

Note: I was unaware until I read Rompey's answer that there exists an alternative one-word spelling ("whosever"); this isn't mentioned in the 1965 edition of Fowler's but is included in the 1996 edition.

3

Whatever reliable dictionary you look up "whosever" in, you'll find out that it is a single word meaning "belonging to whichever person/of whomever".

For example:

The choice, whosever it was, is interesting.

So, no apostrophe is needed in

You can take whosever seat you want.

1

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .